🔗 Share this article

Alison Gaffney and her partner received life-altering information in 2018 when their 17-month-old Fraser was found to have a rare type of blood cancer.

Two years of gruelling treatment followed, comprising cancer medications, targeted radiation, and biological therapies before a bone marrow procedure. Fraser, then aged three, made a “miraculous recovery” from the operation, with physicians announcing the illness in remission.

During this period that Alison, aged thirty-six, began investigating causes. She constantly recalled observations made by medical professionals at the time of her child's illness. “It keeps us up at night wondering how our son got his disease,” a doctor had told her.

“It keeps us up at night wondering how our son got his cancer,” a specialist had informed her.

Background Information

The botched disposal of vast quantities of hazardous substances after the cessation of a major industrial facility in the town in 1979 had “long been recognized,” said the mother. A 2009 civil case linked the local authority's mismanagement of the site to a series of congenital abnormalities in local children during the previous decades.

Increasingly, Gaffney started to associate the circumstances to her own. “[Fraser’s cancer] is not inherited,” she explained. “So what are the reasons? … It’s got to be down to the community. All these kids [with] the disease.

“Each person here is acquainted with a person who’s got a minor [with] illness. This isn't typical.”

Grassroots Movement

Alison and Andy started to reach out to additional households in the town with parallel situations – including some of Gaffney’s former classmates at Brooke Weston Academy – and the collective began gathering thorough information on those impacted. They now spearhead a movement supporting about numerous households with situations of youth disease going back to 1988.

The collective has been urging the town council to examine any relationships between occurrences of childhood cancer in this community and the decommissioning of the industrial site. At the end of this month, medical experts are set to publish their evaluation of whether the community has had a disproportionate number of occurrences of youth disease for its inhabitants of seventy thousand.

“Our only goal is to attempt to safeguard coming generations so they do not have to endure the hardship that we've endured,” said Alison.

Previous Cases

The judgment in the 2009 civil claim accepted that, between 1983 and 1997, millions of tonnes of toxic substances from the industrial facility were transported “almost invariably” from the one area to a specific location in the opposite end – with “substantial volumes” of contaminated substances transported and dumped on local thoroughfares and “large volumes” of airborne particles created by the reclamation.

However, it also cited reports from the environmental authorities in 1997 that identified collections of contaminated material that had been deposited at the site were later taken away in “large quantities”.

Additional Issues

Alison maintains toxic substances was not only dumped at the main disposal area but in additional areas of the community. Recently, she approved a “significant progress” after North Northamptonshire council said it would examine soil that could be tainted and research where hazardous materials was deposited.

Gaffney said government representatives acknowledged in the conference that they lacked information where the areas of hazardous substances could be. “They explained: ‘We don’t know where these locations are. We have no documentation, we possess no information.’”

Local Backing

The official statement was also embraced by another parent, a pastoral lead at a elementary institution, whose young child, Bella, was confirmed to have leukaemia in recent months.

“I had to shave my nine-year-old daughter's scalp because her hair was coming out from the treatments she had to take to kill her illness. Therefore it’s in our interest, it’s in her daughter's welfare [for the council] to share that data,” she stated.

“Numerous people in the community that have been confirmed to have youth disease and It seems it’s cannot be dismissed – it needs looking at. This can’t be normal.”

Family Experiences

Another resident, 31, who works in sales and now has moved away, said families deserved “full transparency and openness” from the local authority.

Lyons’s family member, her sister, succumbed on 24 June 2017 after being found to have a uncommon malignancy at the young age. The girl, who collected money for cancer charities, was “one of the most lovable, entertaining and kindest” persons, Lyons stated.

Her family member recollects the consequence of the cessation of the manufacturing site on the town, Lyons said. “She recalled you couldn’t put your fingers in front of your face because [of] the particulate matter.”

“This has been going on since I’ve probably been about my youth. It's too long and it is carelessness toward the local residents.”

Past Associations

Another family member, a community member, was one of several households involved in the 2009 claim against the previous administration after her newborn was had clubfoot. Her partner, her partner, was a member of the truck operators participating in transporting materials from the steelworks. Their situation was depicted in a television program, and showed the mother cleaning the particles from her partner's pants.

Gaffney said the organization has been approached by individuals with information who were participating in the disposal of substances in the community.